翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Things Hidden Since the Foundation of the World ・ Things Hoped For ・ Things I Never Told You ・ Things in Herds ・ Things in my pocket ・ Things in tha Hood ・ Things Like These ・ Things May Come and Things May Go but the Art School Dance Goes on Forever ・ Things My Girlfriend and I Have Argued About ・ Things Not Seen ・ Things of Beauty ・ Things of Science ・ Things of Stone and Wood ・ Things on Wheels ・ Things Past ・ Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca ・ Things Shaped in Passing ・ Things That Are ・ Things That Can't Be Undone ・ Things That Fall from the Sky ・ Things That Go Bump ・ Things That Go Bump (plays) ・ Things That Go Bump in the Night ・ Things That Go Bump in the Night (Dad's Army episode) ・ Things That Go Bump In The Night Film Festival ・ Things That Go Pump in the Night ・ Things That Hang from Trees ・ Things That Lovers Do ・ Things That Make You Go Hmmm... ・ Things That Never Cross a Man's Mind Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca ： ウィキペディア英語版 Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca ''Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca'', 516 U.S. 124 (1995), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that when an action has been removed from state court to a United States Bankruptcy Court, and the bankruptcy court remands to state court because of a timely-raised defect in removal procedure or lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, the removal statute precludes a United States Court of Appeals from reviewing the order. == Facts == Two corporations were parties to a litigation in an Ohio state court. The defendant filed a bankruptcy petition and sought to remove (transfer) the case to the federal Bankruptcy Court. The Bankruptcy Court accepted the removal, but on appeal, the District Court reversed, holding that the removal petition had been filed after the statutory deadline. The debtor filed a further appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, but that court held that it lacked jurisdiction, because the removal statute barred the Court of Appeals from hearing appeals of remand orders. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the dismissal. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.